In
Decades later, descendants of Lilly Cassirer appear to have lost a bid to retrieve that painting from the Spanish museum where it now hangs.
Los Angeles federal judge John F. Walter ruled Tuesday that
A representative for the museum said he hopes the ruling resolves a yearslong legal fight with Cassirer’s family.
“We now have a decision on the lawful owner and that should put an end to it,” the museum’s U.S. attorney, Thaddeus Stauber, told
The Jewish Federation of San Diego, a beneficiary of the Cassirer estate that has joined the Cassirer family in the case, told HuffPost on Friday that the plaintiffs plan to appeal the decision.
The piece in question was painted in 1897 by the French impressionist
Cassirer’s father-in-law purchased the painting from Pissarro’s art dealer in 1900, the
But the Cassirers’ lives changed drastically when Adolf Hitler became Germany’s chancellor and started implementing
Cassirer reached a monetary settlement of $13,000 with the German government in 1958 over the loss of her painting. The settlement did not bar her from trying to recover the piece, but she never saw it again before her death,
It wasn’t until 1999, when a family friend spotted the painting in a Madrid museum, that the Cassirer family realized what had happened to the piece after the Nazis stole it.
According to the
The painting has been included in exhibitions around the world for years. In 1993, the Spanish government agreed to purchase Thyssen-Bornemisza’s private art collection, now showcased in the museum that bears his name.
Lilly Cassirer’s grandson, Claude Cassirer, first filed a claim for the painting in 2001. After his death, his son, David Cassirer of San Diego, has continued the family’s quest to retrieve the painting.
In the
However, Walter ultimately decided that the baron did not have certain knowledge that the painting was stolen. Furthermore, the judge ruled that the painting’s current owner, the Spanish museum, did not know that the piece was stolen when it passed into their hands in 1993.
Walter said Spain’s position on the painting was “inconsistent” with the principles of the Terezin Declaration, an agreement signed by 46 countries in 2009 that declared Nazi-looted art should be returned to victim’s heirs. Still, since Spanish law dictates that collectors can keep stolen artwork if they are unaware of its tainted provenance at the time of purchase, Walter said the painting belonged to the Spanish museum.
The Cassirer’s family attorney, Steve Zack, told the Los Angeles Times that the family doesn’t agree with the ruling.
“We respectfully disagree that the court cannot force the Kingdom of Spain to comply with its moral commitments,” Zack said.
Susan Halliday, chief financial officer at The Jewish Federation of San Diego, told HuffPost that the organization is disappointed that the Spanish government and the museum are refusing to take the “moral high ground” in this case.
“We wish that, as other institutions have made good faith efforts to resolve provenance issues with Nazi-looted art, the Museum would have taken a similar righteous path, given their vast collection,” Halliday told HuffPost.
During World War II, Hitler
Experts believe the Nazis stole